MCP

AngouriMath over MCP

amcli mcp serves AngouriMath to an LLM agent over the Model Context Protocol: newline-delimited JSON-RPC 2.0 on stdin and stdout, protocol revision 2024-11-05.

The point is verification rather than calculation. A model is confident it can do algebra, so a tool that only offers to do it goes unused; a tool that checks the model's work gets called. So every integral is checked by differentiating it back, a decline is reported as a decline rather than dressed up as an answer, and every response echoes what was parsed.

Install

amcli is the terminal's dotnet tool:

dotnet tool install --global AngouriMath.Terminal
amcli mcp --selftest

The selftest checks a dozen identities, Euler's and Machin's among them, and that each library defect the server's documents describe still reproduces. A defect that no longer reproduces is reported as drift, since the documents then need editing.

Register it with a client by naming amcli and the argument mcp. For Claude Code:

claude mcp add angourimath --scope user -- amcli mcp

For Claude Desktop, in claude_desktop_config.json, and the same shape for any other client:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "angourimath": { "command": "amcli", "args": ["mcp"] }
  }
}

There is no network access, no file access, no configuration and no secret. Every tool is annotated readOnlyHint and openWorldHint: false, so a client can approve calls without asking, which matters: a maths tool that costs a click per call does not get used.

To check the protocol without a client:

echo '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/list","params":{}}' | amcli mcp

Tools

Tool
am_parse	the parse as understood, its LaTeX, its free variables, and warnings
am_simplify	alternatives: true returns several candidate forms
am_solve	a list of constraints, combined with and, so ['x^2 = 4', 'x > 0'] narrows to 2
am_differentiate	any order
am_integrate	always verified by differentiating back. With from and to, a declined integral still gets a numeric value for that interval, to the digits two step counts agree on
am_limit	one-sided with side; tells "no limit" from failure
am_evaluate	the exact form and a decimal, after optional substitutions
am_verify_equal	did your own algebra change the meaning? Names the difference
am_check_steps	checks a chain of working and names the step that broke
am_truth_table	the table and the satisfying assignments
am_solve_system	takes x + y = 3 as well as x + y - 3
am_domain_check	domain conditions, structural hazards, and where it stops being real
am_represent	encodings: bases 2–36, Q-format fixed point, IEEE 754 bits, polar form
am_matrix	determinant, inverse, transpose, rank, RREF, trace, multiply, tensor product, power
am_eigenvalues	exact, via the characteristic polynomial; symbolic entries allowed
am_compare_numeric	worst and RMS error of an approximation over an interval, and where
am_substitute	plug in without evaluating: the shape, not a number
am_expand, am_factor	brackets out, or back into a product
am_series	Taylor or Maclaurin, to a given degree
am_number_theory	factorisation, totient, gcd, divisor count, primality
am_classify	which field a formula comes from, read off its symbols
am_to_sympy	a runnable SymPy program, for cross-checking

Five prompts surface as slash commands in a client: verify-derivation, check-formula, derive-jacobian, analyse-approximation and solve-with-constraints. A model rarely reaches for a maths tool on its own; a prompt is the user reaching for it instead, and it costs nothing in tool-list context.

Three resources: angourimath://syntax, the grammar and its two silent traps; angourimath://reliability, when to trust a result and when to expect a decline; and angourimath://curiosities, famous results with the call that reproduces each. Point a model at the first two at the start of a session.

What the design rests on

Every response echoes the parse. The parser is permissive in two silent ways, and silence is the dangerous part: a valid parse of a different expression, with a plausible answer.

• A number after a name is an exponent: x2 is x², and 2(g+e)3 is 2(g+e)³. A variable named x2 or t0 is silently raised to a power.
• An unknown name before a bracket is a product: im(z) is im * z.

Both raise a warning, and the parsed field always shows what was understood. Whether a name is a function is asked of the parser itself, by parsing name(x), so the warning cannot fall behind the grammar.

The status is explicit: solved, unchanged, declined, suspect, timeout, failed or conflict. declined means the library has no rule, whether it left the expression unevaluated or raised NotSufficientlySupportedException. unchanged means no progress, not "already simplest".

A printed NaN is screened. An answer that exists has none in it.

An approximate answer says how approximate it is. The numeric fallback for a declined definite integral, Entity.DefiniteIntegral, is a first-order rule that returns a hundred digits whatever its accuracy. It is run at two step counts, and only the digits they agree on are reported.

Every call has a budget and its own stack. Each runs under the library's cancellation token on a thread with a 64 MB stack, abandoned rather than killed on timeout, so neither a runaway search nor a deep recursion takes the server down.

Known limits

• LaTeX is output only. Convert \frac{a}{b} to a/b before calling.
• am_verify_equal decides on positive real points, then checks the negatives separately: for sqrt(x^2) against x it answers equal: true with a note that the two agree only on the positives. The note is part of the answer.
• am_solve's solutions[] is tidied root by root and its raw result is not, so the two can read differently. Prefer solutions[].
• A nonlinear system can come back with no solution when one exists.
• Requests are served one at a time. Settings scopes follow the call, so this is not needed for correctness; a stdio client sends one request at a time anyway.

Changing it

dotnet test Sources/Tests/McpUnitTests

The tests drive the server as a client would. They include the selftest, which fails here on a library change that fixes a documented defect, and a check that angourimath://syntax names every function the grammar has. .github/workflows/InteractiveTest.yml runs them.

Each of these looks arbitrary and is not:

• Nothing but JSON-RPC goes to the output. Diagnostics go to the error stream; one stray line corrupts the stream, and the client reports the server as failed.
• Every library call goes through Guard.Run. It is what keeps a stack overflow or a hang inside one request.
• Decline detection reads the raw result, before any Simplify. An unevaluated limit(...) simplifies to NaN, which would turn an honest decline into what looks like a wrong answer.
• Simplify before stripping a provided guard, never after. The guard is what licenses the cancellation: strip provided not a = 0 first and a*(d*a - c*b)/a no longer reduces.
• A warning that fires on correct input is worse than none, because it teaches the caller to ignore the channel. Check a new warning against the correct spelling as well as the broken one.

Each tool costs context and dilutes the descriptions a model routes on, so prefer a parameter on an existing tool, then a prompt, and add a tool last. A tool's description is a routing prompt, not documentation: say when to call it, and where a model would wrongly trust itself, say so.

This is an adapter, not a second computer algebra system. Mathematics belongs in the library, where the terminal and the notebooks get it too, and four workarounds here wait for it: eigenvalues by the characteristic polynomial (#1676), a numeric comparison with a tolerance (#1674), a = b rewritten to a - b for a system (#1673), and the numeric definite integral run twice to find its good digits (#1675).