Skip to content

Support parameter mapping #229

Description

@BlueStaggo

Describe the enhancement
Allow the deobfuscator to give parameters names based on the mappings given just like it did in older versions. It has been like this for a while and I'm surprised there hasn't been an issue for this already.

Current behavior
Function parameters are called var1, var2, var3... regardless of whether mappings are provided for them.

RetroMCP Version
v1.2

Additional context
My test setup uses merged Feather mappings for 1.2.5 which does provide parameter names.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions