Motivation
Embodied.cpp targets edge deployment and lists Jetson-class devices as a
supported deployment platform. I have access to a Jetson AGX Orin 64GB device
and would like to validate the current runtime on a real JetPack 6 environment.
The goal is to produce a reproducible Orin build and inference report, fix
platform-specific compatibility issues, and document the verified setup for
other Jetson users.
Test environment
- NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin Developer Kit 64GB
- Architecture: aarch64 / CUDA compute capability 8.7
- JetPack 6 / L4T r36.4.4
- Ubuntu 22.04
- CUDA 12.6
- cuDNN 9.3
- CMake 3.22.1
- GCC 11.4
- MAXN power mode
Proposed validation scope
1. Build validation
2. Runtime validation
3. Performance characterization
Performance measurements will only be reported from a sufficiently idle system;
initial testing may be limited to build and functional validation.
Initial findings from repository inspection
Before the full validation, I found several Jetson-related areas that may need
attention:
- The README's explicit CUDA architecture examples omit
87, although the WAM
CMake defaults already include it.
- The README defaults to
CUDA_ARCH=native; the documented fallback for CMake
versions older than 3.24 is relevant because JetPack 6/Ubuntu 22.04 provides
CMake 3.22.1 by default.
- The optional LingBot-VA and Cosmos3 cuDNN discovery is restricted to CUDA
toolkit and x86_64-specific paths with NO_DEFAULT_PATH. JetPack normally
installs cuDNN under aarch64 multiarch paths.
- The Cosmos3 source currently includes
cudnn.h using an absolute
/usr/local/cuda-11.6/include/cudnn.h path.
These are preliminary findings. I plan to confirm each one with actual build
logs before proposing code changes.
Proposed deliverables
I would like to submit a PR containing:
- Necessary aarch64/JetPack build fixes confirmed by testing
- A documented AGX Orin build command using
sm_87
- A minimal inference smoke-test procedure
- An Orin validation report with software versions and resource measurements
- No changes to public APIs or model behavior
Questions
- Which model would maintainers prefer as the first Jetson validation target?
pi0.5 appears suitable for initial VLA build and inference validation.
- Should platform-specific fixes be submitted as one Orin support PR or as
smaller independent PRs?
I am happy to carry out the testing and submit the corresponding fixes and
documentation.
Motivation
Embodied.cpp targets edge deployment and lists Jetson-class devices as a
supported deployment platform. I have access to a Jetson AGX Orin 64GB device
and would like to validate the current runtime on a real JetPack 6 environment.
The goal is to produce a reproducible Orin build and inference report, fix
platform-specific compatibility issues, and document the verified setup for
other Jetson users.
Test environment
Proposed validation scope
1. Build validation
CMAKE_CUDA_ARCHITECTURES=872. Runtime validation
3. Performance characterization
Performance measurements will only be reported from a sufficiently idle system;
initial testing may be limited to build and functional validation.
Initial findings from repository inspection
Before the full validation, I found several Jetson-related areas that may need
attention:
87, although the WAMCMake defaults already include it.
CUDA_ARCH=native; the documented fallback for CMakeversions older than 3.24 is relevant because JetPack 6/Ubuntu 22.04 provides
CMake 3.22.1 by default.
toolkit and x86_64-specific paths with
NO_DEFAULT_PATH. JetPack normallyinstalls cuDNN under aarch64 multiarch paths.
cudnn.husing an absolute/usr/local/cuda-11.6/include/cudnn.hpath.These are preliminary findings. I plan to confirm each one with actual build
logs before proposing code changes.
Proposed deliverables
I would like to submit a PR containing:
sm_87Questions
pi0.5appears suitable for initial VLA build and inference validation.smaller independent PRs?
I am happy to carry out the testing and submit the corresponding fixes and
documentation.