Skip to content

Purpose Specification Field #2

Description

@smartopian

** Purpose Specification Field **
Alright, here is my first issue/comment/upgrade, for the issue list for the v0.7 edits that we have and In my opinion it is also the biggest one.
Purpose Specification is used to specify the scope of the purpose which needs to be “explicit, specified and legitimate”.

At the moment we decided to interpret this by defaulting to create a list. This is not a very good because it requires a list somewhere and still the field is still not well defined. Thus it create a dependency at this early. So, why not define the fields and not default to a list?

**For Example: **
With some categories are mandatory and others as options this can be very powerful:
Mandatory

  • First Category: Service Name: (amazon) --
    *Second Category: An Action: (like: marketing, delivery, billing,Profiling ) -
  • Third Profiling - (y/n) (is this data a part of a profile?) -

Optional

  • Preferences, (on/off) -
  • Trust Mark (can be URI of a service) -
  • Data Retention Period (length of purpose) -

*With a: --> * Add + (to add another category to this purpose specification)

The assumption being that each Purpose specification, if externally reference-able, can then be used to turn on and off a preference or purpose from a dashboard or in a service somewhere in the future.

Please let me know how I did with this issue. Happy to answer any question on this or to discuss better ways to make this field awesome.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions