There's a difference between what GitHub mumble to you via their emails and what's discoverable though your tool

[paul-hammant]

Not your fault I think, but it's worth sharing here in case anyone else has the same GitHub's summary can be very different to data surfaced through this excellent tool

Totals (via gh-actions-usage)

- paul-hammant (3xx repositories; 60 workflows; 0ms)
- all repositories (3xx repositories; 60 workflows; 0ms

Yet:

You have used 90% of the Actions minutes included for the paul-hammant account
GitHub Actions Usage
Your plan includes 3,000 Actions minutes per month at no extra cost. You have used 90% so far this billing cycle.
2,750 min used / 3,000 min included

[geoffreywiseman]

@paul-hammant

Yeah, I'd be happy to understand the difference here; I know I've seen issues where a public repo (whose minutes aren't billable) shows up as "0ms" even though I know that Actions have run.

But if within a given billing period, you're getting results that don't match billable minutes, I'd certainly be interested to understand why. This is happening with private repos? I can give you the gh api invocation to check the API I'm calling.

I agree I may not be able to do anything about it, but explaining where the rough edges are and what the limitations on the data I can access are is still good for clarity, yeah.

[geoffreywiseman]

Actually, I think the endpoint I was using is still reporting data but that data is no longer valid, and I need to update the API in use. 🤯

https://github.blog/changelog/2025-02-02-actions-get-workflow-usage-and-get-workflow-run-usage-endpoints-closing-down/

I'll look into it.