Skip to content

Revert "Stop trusting compromised eMudhra roots in the build-toolchain images (#9528)" - #9540

Closed
eliottness wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
eliottness/revert-emudhra-build-images
Closed

eliottness wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
eliottness/revert-emudhra-build-images

Conversation

@eliottness

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

Reverts #9528 (squash commit 759ccb4), which changed the four build-toolchain Dockerfiles (alpine.build, alpine.build.arm64, centos7.build, debian). This PR restores them byte-for-byte to their content before #9528.

Reason for change

#9528 was merged before the CI VMs were rebuilt. The VMs carry these images' layers prebaked, so after the change every Linux job rebuilds the debian image instead of using the cache. In #9528's own PR builds, the debian image step went from a median of 0.9 min to 3.1 min (max 13 min) per job, roughly 470 extra agent-minutes per full pipeline. Builds still pass; it is a CI-wide slowdown. This revert restores the cached images until apm-dotnet rebuilds and republishes the VMs (blue/green), after which #9528 can be re-landed.

Implementation details

git revert of 759ccb4: 4 files, 62 deletions, no other changes. Nothing on master touched these files after #9528.

Test coverage

No new tests: this restores the previously cached Dockerfiles.

Other details

Trade-off: until the change is re-landed, the build-toolchain images trust emSign ECC Root CA - G3 and AAA Certificate Services again, as they did before #9528 (incident IR-62343, APPSEC-71282).

Opened for @DataDog/apm-dotnet to merge (or close, if you prefer to rebuild the VMs now). Sorry for merging #9528 before the VM rebuild was coordinated.

…n images (#9528)"

This reverts commit 759ccb4 (#9528).

The build-toolchain images are prebaked into the CI VMs; changing these Dockerfiles makes every Linux job rebuild the debian image instead of using the cached layers. Revert until apm-dotnet rebuilds and republishes the VMs, then re-land.
@eliottness eliottness added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Oct 27, 2026
@eliottness
eliottness requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2026 19:14
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review 🔄 Running since 2026-10-27T19:14:24.949314Z e5d422d PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T19:23:56.186189Z e5d422d PR opened

Security findings

Advisory findings (1)

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@datadog-prod-us1-5 datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bits Code Review: FAIL

The revert also removes the SCLo repository repair, breaking fresh CentOS toolchain builds when package installation reaches the retired mirror service. Cached layers can mask this failure.

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit e5d422d

@@ -8,10 +8,6 @@ RUN sed -i s/mirror.centos.org/vault.centos.org/g /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo \
&& sed -i s/^mirrorlist=http/#mirrorlist=http/g /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo \
&& yum update -y \
&& yum install -y centos-release-scl \

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Preserve the SCLo repository repair during the revert

On a fresh CentOS toolchain build, centos-release-scl creates repository files after the initial vault rewrite. Removing the second rewrite leaves those SCLo repositories pointing at retired mirrorlist.centos.org, causing the subsequent yum install of devtoolset-11 to fail. Preserve the SCLo repository repair after centos-release-scl installation independently of the certificate rollback.

React: 👍 useful · 👎 wrong · 😕 unclear · 👀 right, but not acting on it

What each reaction means
  • 👍 Useful: correct, and you're fixing it or will.
  • 👎 Wrong: the finding is incorrect, for example the bug can't happen or the code was misread.
  • 😕 Unclear: you can't tell what it means or why it matters.
  • 👀 Right, not acting: correct, but intended, out of scope for this PR, a known risk, or too minor.

🤖 Bits Code Review · Open Bits AI session

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eliottness I'm unsure if this is now a new issue caused by the prior merge.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bouwkast for the record: no, that one predates #9528. mirrorlist.centos.org is gone, so the stock centos7.build.dockerfile no longer built on a cold cache. #9528 fixed it by moving the SCLo repos to vault, and reverting would have brought the break back. Moot now that the VMs are rebuilt and this is closed. Thanks for handling it, and sorry again for the early merge.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Here are some automated security review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e5d422df5f

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@@ -2,12 +2,6 @@
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/runtime-deps:5.0-buster-slim AS base
ARG DOTNETSDK_VERSION

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

P1 Badge Security: Restore the build images' CA distrust rules

An attacker with a compromised eMudhra intermediate key and network interception can exploit this when the image performs an uncached download. Deleting the rules here makes the Debian builder trust that chain again; it then downloads and executes https://apt.llvm.org/llvm.sh without a digest, and CI runs the resulting image with the checkout mounted before publishing Linux tracer packages. Restore the system, NSS, and NuGet distrust rules (and the equivalent Alpine/CentOS rules) rather than trading them for cache performance.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-10-27 20:08:03

Comparing candidate commit e5d422d in PR branch eliottness/revert-emudhra-build-images with baseline commit 6d182cd in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 72 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 10 known flaky benchmarks, 116 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟩 throughput [+4706.666op/s; +5124.587op/s] or [+7.418%; +8.076%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟩 throughput [+58716.181op/s; +72223.511op/s] or [+9.060%; +11.144%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟩 throughput [+4244.237op/s; +4621.363op/s] or [+6.030%; +6.566%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+20.387ms; +75.257ms] or [+4.486%; +16.560%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [-52.466ms; +19.199ms] or [-9.530%; +3.487%]
  • unstable throughput [-50.439op/s; +15.539op/s] or [-8.368%; +2.578%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟩 throughput [+22309.506op/s; +25600.337op/s] or [+8.084%; +9.276%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟩 throughput [+16779.777op/s; +19543.507op/s] or [+6.216%; +7.240%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-15.162KB; -15.140KB] or [-5.507%; -5.499%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-3688.953ns; +2144.953ns] or [-6.867%; +3.993%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-108.524ms; -9.249ms] or [-24.100%; -2.054%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9540) and master.

✅ No regressions detected

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

@andrewlock andrewlock closed this Oct 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants