Skip to content

deps: update dependency django-stubs to v6#208

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/django-stubs-6.x
Open

deps: update dependency django-stubs to v6#208
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/django-stubs-6.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
django-stubs (changelog) >=5.1.3, <6.0.0 → >=6.0.3, <6.1.0 age confidence

Release Notes

typeddjango/django-stubs (django-stubs)

v6.0.3

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: typeddjango/django-stubs@6.0.2...6.0.3

v6.0.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

We now officially support mypy@1.20.
Since this release we run ty over our test cases.

New Contributors

Full Changelog: typeddjango/django-stubs@6.0.1...6.0.2

v6.0.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: typeddjango/django-stubs@6.0.0...6.0.1

v6.0.0

Compare Source

This version add stubs coverage to all known Django 6.0 functionality. If you find anything missing, please open an issue.

Besides Django 6.0 updates, there is an even larger number of other improvements.

Many thanks to everyone who helped out, the amount of contributions has been amazing!

⚠️ Known issues

There is a crash bug in the mypy plugin, when checking code that uses QuerySet.order_by() with abstract models. Please follow #​3184

Django 6.0 stubs updates

Other stubs improvements

Plugin updates

Housekeeping

New Contributors

Full Changelog: typeddjango/django-stubs@5.2.9...6.0.0

v5.2.9

Compare Source

Version 5.2.9 will be the last version to target Django 5.2 -- the next version will be updating to 6.0!

🚀 We need your help: Adding Django 6.0 stubs

Many new Django 6.0 APIs are still missing stubs coverage, and changes to existing APIs are not covered.
If you are interested in contributing, please help by opening PRs (check that a PR does not exist already for your topic).

👉 Starting points

And by the way, we are still missing some things from previous Django versions too! Check earlier release note, other allowlist_todo*.txt files and #​1493 (comment)

🤝 You help us, we help you

If want to help but you are not sure how to implement something in stubs:

What's Changed

Housekeeping

New Contributors

Full Changelog: typeddjango/django-stubs@5.2.8...5.2.9

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner April 20, 2026 15:17
@renovate renovate Bot requested review from Zaimwa9 and removed request for a team April 20, 2026 15:17
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Apr 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.26%. Comparing base (ae79cc7) to head (73e5500).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #208   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.26%   97.26%           
=======================================
  Files         104      104           
  Lines        4459     4459           
=======================================
  Hits         4337     4337           
  Misses        122      122

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Zaimwa9 Zaimwa9 Awaiting requested review from Zaimwa9 Zaimwa9 is a code owner automatically assigned from Flagsmith/flagsmith-back-end

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@codecov-commenter