Change README title to Sidekick app extensions intent types#1
Merged
Conversation
Updated the title of the README to reflect the focus on Sidekick app extensions.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated the title of the README to reflect the focus on Sidekick app extensions.
Proposed type
application/...create/edit/ bothWhy this type
What merchant intents does this capture? Real examples beat hypotheticals.
Who would register intents for it
Apps you've talked to (yours plus others), or app categories you'd expect to register.
Schema sketch
Either a JSON Schema fenced below, or a link to a Gist / branch / external schema.
{ }Confirmed:
inputSchemadoes not declarerequiredfieldstypes/Prior art
Existing types this is closest to, and why a new type rather than extending one of them:
Anything else
Open questions, things you're unsure about, areas where you'd especially like reviewer input.