OAK-12276: Upgrade jackson-databind dependency to 2.22.0

[reschke]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Commit-Check ❌

Commit rejected by Commit-Check.                                  
                                                                  
  (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)  
   / ._. \      / ._. \      / ._. \      / ._. \      / ._. \   
 __\( C )/__  __\( H )/__  __\( E )/__  __\( C )/__  __\( K )/__ 
(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)
   || E ||      || R ||      || R ||      || O ||      || R ||   
 _.' '-' '._  _.' '-' '._  _.' '-' '._  _.' '-' '._  _.' '-' '._ 
(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)
 `-´     `-´  `-´     `-´  `-´     `-´  `-´     `-´  `-´     `-´ 
                                                                  
Commit rejected.                                                  
                                                                  
Type message check failed ==> OAK-12276: Upgrade jackson-databind dependency to 2.22.0 
The commit message should follow Conventional Commits. See https://www.conventionalcommits.org
Suggest: Use <type>(<scope>): <description>, where <type> is one of: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, chore, perf, build, ci 

--- Commit 2/2:
Type message check failed ==> OAK-12276: Upgrade jackson-databind dependency to 2.22.0 - align OSGi tests 
The commit message should follow Conventional Commits. See https://www.conventionalcommits.org
Suggest: Use <type>(<scope>): <description>, where <type> is one of: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, chore, perf, build, ci

[rishabhdaim]

just as a cautionary step, can we jump one minor version at one time.

Apart from that PR looks okk.

[reschke]

That would be three steps for changes since last August.

[reschke]

@rishabhdaim - what's your preference: just separate PRs, or seperate tickets?

[rishabhdaim]

I would prefer 3 separate tickets, 1 for each and we should do 1 per release (if possible).

[reschke]

With one per release we may not be able to keep up :-)

[rishabhdaim]

okk, for this case, lets jump twice in next release.