Skip to content

Extension's extraCityObjects schema does not reflect the specs #139

Description

@balazsdukai

The specs declare 6 rules to follow to define new CityObjects, but according to the schema anything is allowed in a CityObject:

"(\\+)([A-Z])\\w+": {}

Shouldn't the extraCityObjects validation schema be more specific?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions