Add a dockerfile to make pretty

[Growl1234]

This is a first try to take on code checking and prettifying that is temporily dropped in the GitHub Actions workflow.

This dockerfile uses tools same as what GitHub Precommit workflow uses, and execute clang-tidy --fix and clang-format to make-pretty the C++ codes.

If this approach can be successful, here are what to do:

1. Re-enable Precommit workflow in a seperate yaml file (split from Tests).
2. Run clang-tidy in parallel.

An ideal long-term solution would be to take inspiration from CP2K’s approach and implement a complete and reliable pre-commit workflow.

[QuantumMisaka]

@Growl1234 Why there are so many pyabacus changes ?

[Growl1234]

@Growl1234 Why there are so many pyabacus changes ?

This is an automatic workflow and the PR is currently just a draft. The problems introduced here would all be fixed before this PR is marked as ready.

[Growl1234]

And it seems at least those settings in .clang-format are incorrect and would cause a lot of errors:

IncludeBlocks: Regroup
SortIncludes: true

[Growl1234]

It seems the precommit workflow would check on code outside abacus and give error about them (such as OpenMPI).

Although there might be ways to solve the problem, I do not think the current approach is reliable enough for ABACUS. We should stop directly relying on the generic pre-commit/action clang-tidy workflow and instead switch to a project-controlled DIY workflow, i.e. the “ideal long-term solution” mentioned above. This would allow us to explicitly restrict both the checked files and the fix-it scope to ABACUS source files.

[Growl1234]

We should stop directly relying on the generic pre-commit/action clang-tidy workflow and instead switch to a project-controlled DIY workflow, i.e. the “ideal long-term solution” mentioned above. This would allow us to explicitly restrict both the checked files and the fix-it scope to ABACUS source files.

Closing this PR based on the thought above.