Conversation
Rangi42
added
meta
Rangi42
marked this pull request as draft
September 22, 2026 02:43
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #2062.
We have previously talked about using CPack for more artifact uploads, instead of individually grouping/zipping them together.
One issue with doing so is that CPack would not include
install.sh, which is needed for the release archives. That's why this PR only updates the testing binary archives.Another issue is that CPack 3.x did not support
CPACK_PACKAGE_FILE_NAME, and that's the version installed on some of GitHub's CI runners (including Ubuntu prior to the not-yet-available 26.04.1 LTS). This PR attempts to use the latest CPack from its maker Kitware'saptrepository.