SRE-981: Split the graph store and authorization Rust crates and TypeScript packages

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

libs/@local/graph/store and libs/@local/graph/authorization each held a crate and the package exporting its generated types. Each crate moves to rust/, and a sibling typescript/ holds @local/hash-graph-store and @local/hash-graph-authorization.

The two go together because store's generated declarations import authorization's.

Builds on SRE-980.

🔍 What does this change?

• Both TypeScript packages follow the shape SRE-980 settled on: codegen copies the crate's snapshot into src/generated, build emits dist, exports points there
• Eighteen hand-written imports move from @rust/…/types to @local/…/types, across the frontend, the API, the SDK, the isomorphic utilities and the integration tests
• Four of those consumers had never declared the dependency and resolved it by hoisting — they declare it now, so affectedPackages can see the edge

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

• affected the execution graph, and the turbo.json's have been updated to reflect this

🐾 Next steps

SRE-982 and SRE-983, then SRE-984.

❓ How to test this?

1. turbo run lint:tsc build --filter=@local/hash-graph-store --filter=@local/hash-graph-authorization
2. turbo run lint:tsc --filter=@local/hash-graph-sdk --filter=@apps/hash-frontend
3. mise run sync:turborepo && git diff --exit-code '**/package.json'

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview	Aug 29, 2026 6:55pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Aug 29, 2026 6:55pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Aug 29, 2026 6:55pm
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Aug 29, 2026 6:55pm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.99%. Comparing base (32efb65) to head (e3105db).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                                         Coverage Diff                                          @@
##           t/sre-980-split-the-hash-codec-rust-crate-and-typescript-package    #9442      +/-   ##
====================================================================================================
- Coverage                                                             60.99%   60.99%   -0.01%     
====================================================================================================
  Files                                                                  1447     1447              
  Lines                                                                144468   144468              
  Branches                                                               6687     6687              
====================================================================================================
- Hits                                                                  88121    88120       -1     
- Misses                                                                55243    55244       +1     
  Partials                                                               1104     1104              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	14.68% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	38.15% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	12.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	2.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.24% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-config	100.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	19.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authentication	97.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	63.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	32.02% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	48.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	50.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-middleware	92.19% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	79.82% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Wide import and build-graph churn across API, frontend, and SDK touching authorization and store types, but behavior should be unchanged if codegen and Turbo task ordering stay correct.

Overview
Reorganizes hash-graph-authorization and hash-graph-store so Rust lives under rust/ and generated TypeScript types ship from new workspace packages @local/hash-graph-authorization and @local/hash-graph-store, matching the SRE-980 split pattern (codegen → src/generated, build → dist).

@rust/hash-graph-* npm packages in those folders no longer publish type exports; apps and shared TS code now import @local/hash-graph-authorization/types and @local/hash-graph-store/types instead of @rust/…. The graph SDK, hash-api, hash-frontend, hash-isomorphic-utils, and integration tests are updated, and several consumers gain explicit package.json dependencies that were previously satisfied by hoisting. Cargo workspace members and path aliases point at authorization/rust and store/rust; store’s TS codegen snapshots reference the local authorization package for cross-crate types.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit e3105db. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing t/sre-981-split-the-graph-store-and-authorization-rust-crates-and (e3105db) with t/sre-980-split-the-hash-codec-rust-crate-and-typescript-package (32efb65)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$17.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$9.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.948 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$9.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$2.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$1.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.64 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$1.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.34 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.586 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.701 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$22.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$24.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$57.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$22.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$181 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.48 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}20.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$7.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$6.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$6.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.279 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$7.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$7.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$7.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.893 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$6.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$7.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$7.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$7.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.488 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$7.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.581 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$6.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$6.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$7.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$7.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$7.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$6.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$7.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.576 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$7.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$5.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$69.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.948 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.680 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$52.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 466 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.480 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$46.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 439 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$37.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$38.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.615 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$78.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$84.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$317 \mathrm{ms} \pm 720 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph