SRE-986: Dissolve the graph type-defs crate into the graph API by TimDiekmann · Pull Request #9445 · hashintel/hash

TimDiekmann · 2026-08-29T20:49:51Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

libs/@local/graph/type-defs generated Rust from two TypeScript files by shelling out to yarn tsx and quicktype from build.rs, so building the Graph needed a working yarn install. Of that output only status_payloads.rs was included at all, and of its three structs only ErrorInfo was ever constructed.

Its only consumers are rest/json.rs and rest/entity_type.rs, and rest/status.rs already owns the conversion into responses. The crate moves there and disappears.

Builds on SRE-983. Last crate directory carrying a hand-maintained TypeScript surface, which is what SRE-984 was waiting on.

🔍 What does this change?

ErrorInfo is hand-written in rest/status.rs, keeping its field names and its HASH Graph domain default. RequestInfo and ResourceInfo are gone — nothing ever constructed them
The StatusPayloadInfo wrapper is gone with them, so the error body changes from {"contents":[{"Error":{…}}]} to {"contents":[{…}]}. That is what json_schemas/status.json already described; the externally tagged enum was the deviation. The schemas narrow to the payload that remains
openapi.json itself does not change — it references ./models/status.json, and the generator emits no client model for it
The backend integration test builds its GraphStatus from @local/status, which is where the crate's TypeScript re-exported it from anyway

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

affected the execution graph, and the turbo.json's have been updated to reflect this

🐾 Next steps

SRE-984. With this merged no crate directory carries a JavaScript surface, so the remaining package.json files are pure generated wiring.

metadata stays on ErrorInfo for now: five call sites put the serde error text, the rejected entity type ID and the colliding base URL there, and none of that appears in message. H-3009 wants to add report information to it. Replacing it is a separate change.

🛡 What tests cover this?

The backend integration tests exercise the admin endpoints whose responses carry this status shape.

❓ How to test this?

cargo clippy --all-features -p hash-graph-api
turbo run codegen:generate-openapi-specs --filter '@rust/hash-graph-api' && git diff --exit-code libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json
mise run sync:turborepo && git diff --exit-code '**/package.json'

The napi module kept `lib.rs` and `index.ts` in one `src`, which is the layout the tool expects but leaves both manifests in one directory. The crate moves to `rust/`, the package to `typescript/`, and `napi build` is pointed at the crate with `--manifest-path`. Unlike the other splits nothing generated crosses the boundary: napi compiles the crate straight into the package's `dist` beside the declarations it emits, and `tsc` builds over both. The package now depends on the crate. Without that the package graph has no edge between them, and a change to `lib.rs` would not select the package that compiles it.

Only ErrorInfo was ever constructed, so the payload enum goes with the crate. The error body loses its "Error" wrapper, which is the shape json_schemas/status.json always described.

vercel · 2026-08-29T20:49:57Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

4 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ignored	Preview	Aug 29, 2026 9:44pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Aug 29, 2026 9:44pm
petrinaut	Skipped		Aug 29, 2026 9:44pm
petrinaut-docs	Skipped		Aug 29, 2026 9:44pm

codecov · 2026-08-29T20:54:35Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 61.00%. Comparing base (9c2a890) to head (6a5c7c0).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/status.rs	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity_type.rs	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/json.rs	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                                         Coverage Diff                                          @@
##           t/sre-983-split-the-effect-dns-hickory-rust-crate-and-typescript    #9445      +/-   ##
====================================================================================================
+ Coverage                                                             60.99%   61.00%   +0.01%     
====================================================================================================
  Files                                                                  1447     1447              
  Lines                                                                144468   144446      -22     
  Branches                                                               6687     6687              
====================================================================================================
+ Hits                                                                  88118    88121       +3     
+ Misses                                                                55246    55221      -25     
  Partials                                                               1104     1104

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.99% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`14.68% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`38.15% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`3.27% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.02% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`12.22% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`2.36% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.81% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.26% <ø> (+0.04%)`	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-config	`100.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`19.84% <0.00%> (+0.07%)`	⬆️
rust.hash-graph-authentication	`97.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`63.14% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	`91.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`32.02% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`48.41% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`50.18% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`84.71% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-middleware	`92.19% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`89.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.39% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`78.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.51% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`79.82% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.09% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`87.92% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.04% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-08-29T20:59:03Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing t/sre-986-dissolve-the-graph-type-defs-crate-into-the-graph-api (88ba673) with t/sre-983-split-the-effect-dns-hickory-rust-crate-and-typescript (9c2a890)}

cursor · 2026-08-29T21:44:50Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Changes the serialized REST error contents shape, which can break clients that expected the former externally tagged Error wrapper.

Overview
Removes the hash-graph-type-defs workspace crate (including its build.rs yarn/quicktype codegen) and drops it from Cargo.toml, lockfile, and @rust/hash-graph-api dependencies.

ErrorInfo and the REST Status alias now live in rest/status.rs, with call sites in entity_type.rs and json.rs importing them there instead of wrapping payloads in StatusPayloadInfo. Unused RequestInfo / ResourceInfo types are deleted.

Breaking HTTP shape: error contents entries are plain ErrorInfo objects (metadata, reason, domain) instead of {"Error":{…}}. OpenAPI/JSON Schema under openapi/models and rest/json_schemas are narrowed to match; the HashQL HTTP test now asserts contents[0].metadata.

TypeScript integration tests use Status<ErrorInfo> from @local/status rather than @rust/hash-graph-type-defs. Dependency diagrams are renumbered after removing the crate node.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88ba673. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

github-actions · 2026-08-29T23:00:10Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.400 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.618 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.848 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.533 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.056 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.558 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.579 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.245 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.297 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.901 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.297 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$36.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}20.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$40.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.676 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$49.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$90.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 688 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}40.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$307 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.30 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.681 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.759 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.327 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.683 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.701 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$7.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$55.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 579 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.800 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 684 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.110 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$62.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 530 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.905 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$79.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 815 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.661 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$85.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 692 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$70.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 516 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$48.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$57.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 381 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.833 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 476 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 577 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.271 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 736 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 767 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.232 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$526 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.46 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

TimDiekmann added 3 commits August 29, 2026 21:40

SRE-983: Give the hickory crate its clippy scripts

9c2a890

SRE-986: Dissolve the graph type-defs crate into the graph API

6a5c7c0

Only ErrorInfo was ever constructed, so the payload enum goes with the crate. The error body loses its "Error" wrapper, which is the shape json_schemas/status.json always described.

TimDiekmann self-assigned this Aug 29, 2026

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 29, 2026 20:50 — with GitHub Actions Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens August 29, 2026 20:51 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs August 29, 2026 20:52 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 29, 2026 20:53 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash August 29, 2026 21:03 View deployment

SRE-986: Drop the payload wrapper from the hashql error assertion

88ba673

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 29, 2026 21:44 Inactive

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs August 29, 2026 21:44 Inactive

TimDiekmann requested a review from a team August 29, 2026 21:44

TimDiekmann marked this pull request as ready for review August 29, 2026 21:44

TimDiekmann requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2026 21:44

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 29, 2026 21:44 — with GitHub Actions Active

TimDiekmann mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2026

SRE-988: Use affectedTasks instead of affectedPackages in Turborepo #9455

Merged

4 tasks

indietyp reviewed Aug 31, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/type-defs/build.rs

indietyp approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

View reviewed changes

vilkinsons approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

View reviewed changes

TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 31, 2026

github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue because a pull request earlier in the stack was removed Aug 31, 2026

TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 31, 2026

Base automatically changed from t/sre-983-split-the-effect-dns-hickory-rust-crate-and-typescript to t/sre-982-remove-the-graph-api-packages-javascript-surface August 31, 2026 10:42

Merged via the queue into main with commit d480fa3 Aug 31, 2026
219 checks passed

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

SRE-986: Dissolve the graph type-defs crate into the graph API - #9445

SRE-986: Dissolve the graph type-defs crate into the graph API#9445
TimDiekmann merged 4 commits into
t/sre-982-remove-the-graph-api-packages-javascript-surfacefrom
t/sre-986-dissolve-the-graph-type-defs-crate-into-the-graph-api

TimDiekmann commented Aug 29, 2026

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

TimDiekmann commented Aug 29, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

vercel Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Aug 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading