FE-1565: Upgrade Petrinaut's Rolldown DTS toolchain

[kube]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Upgrade every library using rolldown-plugin-dts to the latest compatible stack, simplify its configuration, and preserve valid public declarations.

🔗 Related links

• rolldown-plugin-dts 0.28.3

🚫 Blocked by

Nothing.

🔍 What does this change?

• Upgrades Petrinaut, Petrinaut Core, and Refractive to rolldown-plugin-dts 0.28.3, Rolldown 1.2.6, and Vite 8.2.2.
• Uses generator: "tsgo" and Vite's OXC declaration exclusions, removing plugin-order rewrites and unused ES-build configuration.
• Normalizes declaration filenames and package type exports; all public entry-point export sets remain unchanged.
• Externalizes ai only from Petrinaut's declaration graph, while keeping its runtime JavaScript bundled.

Warm direct-Vite medians, baseline → updated toolchain with externalized ai declarations:

Package	Wall time	Peak RSS
Petrinaut	5.50 → 5.61s (+2.00%)	1503.84 → 1503.13 MiB (-0.05%)
Petrinaut Core	2.19 → 2.23s (+1.83%)	1027.61 → 899.59 MiB (-12.46%)
Refractive	0.23 → 0.22s (-4.35%)	139.86 → 128.06 MiB (-8.44%)
Sequential total	7.92 → 8.06s (+1.77%)	—

Paired Petrinaut builds on the updated toolchain, inline → externalized ai declarations:

Metric	Inline	Externalized	Change
Wall time	6.36s	6.20s	-2.52%
Peak RSS	1541.55 MiB	1470.52 MiB	-4.61%
Raw declarations	476,252 B	51,538 B	-89.18%
Gzip declarations	94,018 B	15,322 B	-83.70%
CommonJS-DTS warnings	53	0	-100%

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🐾 Next steps

None.

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Builds and payload checks for all three packages.
• yarn install --immutable, yarn constraints, yarn dedupe --strategy highest --check, and package-level TypeScript/ESLint checks.
• 1,074 Petrinaut Core tests and 267 Petrinaut tests.
• All 16 manifest type targets exist; all 31 declarations parse and public export sets match the baseline.

❓ How to test this?

1. Run each package's build script.
2. Run each package's prepack payload check.

📹 Demo

Not applicable.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview	Aug 31, 2026 12:27pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Aug 31, 2026 12:27pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Aug 31, 2026 12:27pm
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Aug 31, 2026 12:27pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Touches published package type entrypoints and the declaration bundling pipeline for three libraries; runtime behavior should be unchanged but consumers depend on correct .d.ts paths and export graphs.

Overview
Upgrades Petrinaut, Petrinaut Core, and Refractive to rolldown-plugin-dts 0.28.3, Rolldown 1.2.6, and Vite 8.2.2, with matching yarn.lock updates.

Declaration output and package metadata: Published types / exports paths are corrected from *.d.d.ts to *.d.ts. DTS generation switches to dts({ generator: "tsgo" }) and drops the old fake-js plugin ordering workaround. Vite oxc.exclude is set so emitted .d.ts (and .js where needed) are not run through OXC as JavaScript.

Build config tweaks: Rolldown output.globals is removed where unused. Petrinaut Core keeps optional peer typescript external only via esmExternalRequirePlugin, not Rolldown’s JS external list. Petrinaut adds a Rolldown external hook that externalizes the ai package only when resolving from declaration files, shrinking bundled .d.ts without dropping ai from the runtime bundle.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 44f5ba2. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing codex/upgrade-rolldown-dts (44f5ba2) with main (aa913dd)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (5b5c8ed) during the generation of this report, so aa913dd was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.02%. Comparing base (900d9cd) to head (44f5ba2).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9449   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.02%   61.02%           
=======================================
  Files        1449     1449           
  Lines      144641   144641           
  Branches     6692     6692           
=======================================
+ Hits        88263    88264    +1     
+ Misses      55274    55273    -1     
  Partials     1104     1104           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	14.68% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	38.15% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	12.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	2.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.23% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-config	74.74% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	19.84% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authentication	97.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	63.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	32.02% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	48.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	50.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-middleware	92.19% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	79.82% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.943 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.952 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.622 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.559 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.139 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$43.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$33.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.090 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$37.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.18 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}14.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$50.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.637 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 726 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.874 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.362 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$308 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.35 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}18.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.966 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.944 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$58.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.581 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 640 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$67.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$78.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 626 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$84.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 618 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$90.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 591 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.191 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$43.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$73.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 538 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 424 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 453 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.112 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.332 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 434 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 745 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 825 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.980 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-17.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$539 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.80 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph