Fix NPE when re-using ArrayByteBufferPool after it was cleared when the QueuedPool is used - #15808
Merged
lorban merged 14 commits intoSep 24, 2026
Conversation
…dPool is used Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
sbordet
requested changes
Sep 18, 2026
… update the queueSize Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
sbordet
requested changes
Sep 18, 2026
|
|
||
| private void remove(QueuedEntry<P> entry) | ||
| { | ||
| if (queue.remove(entry)) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think this is right WRT the comment in QueuedPool.terminate().
Either we change this, or change that comment if it's ok to concurrently remove entries while terminate() runs.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch, I've now revised remove() and terminate() to better align how they work and I added an extra test asserting they stay coherent.
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
sbordet
requested changes
Sep 18, 2026
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
sbordet
self-requested a review
September 21, 2026 07:38
…e that the action can never succeed Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
…needs to be nulled to enact a state change Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
…n the list Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
sbordet
requested changes
Sep 22, 2026
…ect one and try to remove it Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
… known out-of-pool entries to avoid scanning the queue in the common case Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
sbordet
requested changes
Sep 23, 2026
…ns an empty queue per remove() call Signed-off-by: Ludovic Orban <lorban@bitronix.be>
sbordet
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2026
lorban
deleted the
fix/12.1.x/15807-npe-in-compounded-ArrayByteBufferPool-clear
branch
September 24, 2026 07:32
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #15807