-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Improve udp tunnel stability #406
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
magnww
wants to merge
10
commits into
jpillora:master
Choose a base branch
from
magnww:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d511a10
add a mutex to activatingConn.Wait()
magnww 1edbbeb
retry when ssh tunnel is not established
magnww db8c112
retry when ssh tunnel is not established
magnww 9d3955f
do not exit the loop when the connection is broken
magnww f2dd211
remove ssh wait in udp mode
magnww 6bc9491
remove getSSHNoWait()
magnww d901c92
format
magnww bddeacc
Fix activatingConnWait() not waiting when connection is lost
magnww 4cf9a12
add tunnel.Close() method to solve possible memory leaks
magnww afa47e8
Merge branch 'jpillora:master' into master
magnww File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
need a lock/unlock + nil check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
activatingConn is a waitGroup, it is value type and thread safe, so no need for lock and nil checks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah yea that's right, its a custom wait group (which might be a bad idea itself - anyway)
it should block while disconnected/connecting and it should not-block while connected
DoneAll here would stop blocking, but Tunnel Done means closed?
how does this improve UDP? sorry, I think I'm missing something
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the original code, when the connection is lost, DoneAll in the BindSSH method will be called, which causes activatingConnWait() to not work and cannot block.
This leads to high resource usage of runOutbound in udpListener. Calling
u.getUDPChan(ctx)will immediately gets nil instead of blocking.Closeis added to correctly release resources in server mode, because DoneAll was removed from BindSSH.In client mode, there is no need to call DoneAll because the same tunnel is always used.