Skip to content

Naa exo support update#783

Open
tay-caliguiri wants to merge 5 commits intodevfrom
NAA-EXO-Support-Update
Open

Naa exo support update#783
tay-caliguiri wants to merge 5 commits intodevfrom
NAA-EXO-Support-Update

Conversation

@tay-caliguiri
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tay-caliguiri tay-caliguiri commented Apr 17, 2026

updated both 11.6 and 12.0

@tay-caliguiri tay-caliguiri requested a review from a team as a code owner April 17, 2026 20:02
@tay-caliguiri
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

tay-caliguiri commented Apr 17, 2026

@claude fix all issues

@github-actions @claude
docs: fix Logons footnote clarity in Exchange support tables
04c0f4f 
- Bold the Logons sub-group name per Netwrix naming conventions
- Add context identifying Logons as a sub-group of job group 4. Mailboxes
- Replace backslash path separator with > in Exchange Online reference

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 17, 2026

Auto-Fix Summary

0 issues fixed, 0 skipped across 2 files

Ask @claude on this PR if you'd like an explanation of any fix.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 17, 2026

Documentation PR Review

Editorial Review

docs/accessanalyzer/11.6/requirements/exchange/support/support.md
docs/accessanalyzer/12.0/requirements/exchange/support/support.md

Both files receive identical changes, so the analysis applies to both.

The wording simplifications throughout (intro sentence, "provide a breakdown of" → "show", permissions section lead-in) are all clean improvements with no issues.

One issue in the new footnote added to both files:

  • Clarity — Line 53: "For the Exchange Online version of this group, use 8. Exchange Online > Mailboxes." The phrase "Exchange Online version of this group" implies job group 4 has a variant, when the intent is to redirect the reader to a different job group entirely. Suggested fix: "For Exchange Online targets, use job group 8. Exchange Online > Mailboxes instead."

Summary

1 editorial suggestion across 2 files (same issue in both). Vale and Dale issues are auto-fixed separately.

What to do next:

Comment @claude on this PR followed by your instructions to get help:

  • @claude fix all issues — fix all editorial issues
  • @claude help improve the flow of this document — get writing assistance
  • @claude explain the voice issues — understand why something was flagged

You can ask Claude anything about the review or about Netwrix writing standards.

Automated fixes are only available for branches in this repository, not forks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tay-caliguiri @jth-nw