Skip to content

test_runner: dont buffer unordered events in process isolation mode#63432

Open
MoLow wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
MoLow:test-runner-execution-ordered-bypass
Open

test_runner: dont buffer unordered events in process isolation mode#63432
MoLow wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
MoLow:test-runner-execution-ordered-bypass

Conversation

@MoLow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@MoLow MoLow commented May 19, 2026

No description provided.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/test_runner

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem. labels May 19, 2026
@MoLow MoLow added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels May 19, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 19, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.06%. Comparing base (0e8fb91) to head (645894d).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #63432      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.06%   90.06%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         714      714              
  Lines      225918   225927       +9     
  Branches    42735    42737       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits       203471   203479       +8     
+ Misses      14232    14227       -5     
- Partials     8215     8221       +6     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/internal/test_runner/runner.js 94.38% <100.00%> (+0.76%) ⬆️

... and 25 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 19, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@MoLow MoLow force-pushed the test-runner-execution-ordered-bypass branch from f10d090 to 4ed0176 Compare May 19, 2026 21:17
@atlowChemi atlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 20, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@atlowChemi

This comment was marked as resolved.

@MoLow MoLow force-pushed the test-runner-execution-ordered-bypass branch from 4ed0176 to e8250c8 Compare May 20, 2026 09:50
@MoLow MoLow added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 20, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@atlowChemi

This comment was marked as resolved.

Signed-off-by: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
@MoLow MoLow force-pushed the test-runner-execution-ordered-bypass branch from e8250c8 to 645894d Compare May 20, 2026 12:09
@MoLow MoLow added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 20, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants