Skip to content

debug - #180

Open
kkanag314 wants to merge 2 commits into
support/8.6.3.0from
topic/RDKEMW-24721
Open

debug#180
kkanag314 wants to merge 2 commits into
support/8.6.3.0from
topic/RDKEMW-24721

Conversation

@kkanag314

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@kkanag314
kkanag314 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2026 11:23
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 9, 2026 11:23

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

The changes redirect default feeds to a debug artifact path and hard-assign the release identifier in a way that can unintentionally impact all consumers and reduces downstream configurability.

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the middleware IPK feed configuration to point at a debug artifact location and changes the configured release identifier used to build the feed URL paths.

Changes:

  • Updated MW_IPK_PATH and MW_OSS_IPK_PATH defaults to use middleware-dbg/${RELEASE_NUM} instead of the prior release path.
  • Updated RELEASE_NUM value to RDKEMW-24721, affecting the resolved feed URL directory.
File summaries
File Description
conf/machine/include/oss_mw.inc Switches OSS middleware feed base path default to the debug artifact directory.
conf/machine/include/middleware.inc Changes the release identifier and switches the main middleware feed base path default to the debug artifact directory.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 3
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

RELEASE_NUM = "RDKEMW-24721"

MW_IPK_PATH ?= "middleware-rel/${RELEASE_NUM}"
MW_IPK_PATH ?= "middleware-dbg/${RELEASE_NUM}"
PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS:append = " ${MW_OSS} "
OPKG_ARCH_PRIORITY:${MW_OSS} = "205"
MW_OSS_IPK_PATH ?= "middleware-rel/${RELEASE_NUM}"
MW_OSS_IPK_PATH ?= "middleware-dbg/${RELEASE_NUM}"
Comment thread conf/machine/include/middleware.inc
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 9, 2026 12:05

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔵 Needs a closer look

The changes alter the default artifact feed source to a debug channel in shared include files, which can have broad operational impact without an explicit config toggle.

Review details

Suppressed comments (2)

conf/machine/include/middleware.inc:11

  • Defaulting MW_IPK_PATH to the debug feed and hard-coding a ticket-specific RELEASE_NUM in a shared include makes the default configuration environment-specific; it’s safer to keep a stable default and make the feed channel/RELEASE_NUM overrideable via local.conf/distro config without patching this file.
RELEASE_NUM = "RDKEMW-21379_MSNOW"

MW_IPK_PATH ?= "middleware-dbg/${RELEASE_NUM}"
MW_IPK_SERVER_PATH ?= "${RDK_ARTIFACTS_BASE_URL}/${MW_IPK_PATH}/${RDK_MW_ARCH}/ipks/${BUILD_VARIANT}"

conf/machine/include/oss_mw.inc:6

  • MW_OSS_IPK_PATH now defaults to the debug feed, which changes the default artifact source for all OSS middleware package feeds; consider parameterizing the channel (rel vs dbg) similarly to middleware.inc so consumers can switch via config rather than editing this include.
MW_OSS_IPK_PATH ?= "middleware-dbg/${RELEASE_NUM}"
MW_OSS_IPK_SERVER_PATH = "${RDK_ARTIFACTS_BASE_URL}/${MW_OSS_IPK_PATH}/${RDK_MW_ARCH}/${MW_OSS}/ipks/${BUILD_VARIANT}"
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 15, 2026 06:40

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

No unresolved review comments remain.

Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants