Keep solver state axes structured#13
Open
rogeriojorge wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
rogeriojorge
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 13, 2026 03:20
This was referenced Jul 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
(species, p, m, n, y, kx, z)axes during time integrationCkandFkoutput layoutThis is the smallest state-layout prerequisite for later JAX sharding: the distribution's species and Hermite axes now remain visible to the compiler throughout the solve.
Numerical validation
pytest -q(3 passed)CkandFkoutputs are bitwise identical toorigin/mainCkandFkoutputs are bitwise identical toorigin/mainCPU benchmark
Fresh-process Orszag-Tang runs with Tsit5 and fixed
dt=0.002:Lowering plus compilation was slightly slower in the separated 65x65 measurement (0.911 s versus 0.829 s); the measured gain is in stepping, not compilation.