Repository navigation
Performance Regression: -13.28%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 4 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2057 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 503 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | density_sweep_single_slice[0.9] |
32.1 µs | 48.3 µs | -33.57% |
| ❌ | Simulation | sum_v2_i64 |
193.9 µs | 224.7 µs | -13.7% |
| ❌ | Simulation | sum_i64 |
194 µs | 224.4 µs | -13.56% |
| ❌ | WallTime | dict_canonicalize_gt_u8_neon[1000000] |
488.7 µs | 547.2 µs | -10.68% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | compare_u64_avx2 |
4.1 µs | 3.7 µs | +10.8% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing mk/standalone-array-plugins (e50242a) with develop (292cf6f)
Footnotes
-
503 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩