Skip to content

Optimise bitpacked filtering for valid runs and buffer filtering - #10281

Draft
robert3005 wants to merge 9 commits into
developfrom
rk/bitpacked-filter
Draft

robert3005 wants to merge 9 commits into
developfrom
rk/bitpacked-filter

less

e00d694
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed / CodSpeed Performance Analysis succeeded Oct 8, 2026 in 0s

Performance Gate Passed

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 8 improved benchmarks
✅ 2167 untouched benchmarks
🆕 4 new benchmarks
⏩ 534 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚡ Simulation density_sweep_dense_runs[0.001] 48 µs 30.3 µs +58.49%
⚡ Simulation random_i128[0.01] 7 µs 4.6 µs +53.49%
⚡ Simulation filter_powerlaw_by_mostly_true[250000] 150 µs 103.8 µs +44.52%
⚡ Simulation random_i128[0.5] 116.6 µs 101.8 µs +14.57%
⚡ Simulation patterns_i128[Random] 116.5 µs 101.8 µs +14.39%
⚡ Simulation random_i128[0.8] 174.8 µs 153.2 µs +14.06%
⚡ Simulation patterns_i128[Runs] 117.2 µs 103 µs +13.81%
⚡ Simulation random_i256[0.8] 123.4 µs 111.8 µs +10.34%
🆕 Simulation fsl_i32[16, 0.1] N/A 591.4 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation fsl_i32[4, 0.1] N/A 813 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation primitive_i32[0.01] N/A 179.1 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation primitive_i32[0.1] N/A 518.9 µs N/A

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing rk/bitpacked-filter (e00d694) with develop (c93ffa3)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 534 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩