Upgrade: forbid upgrading with a key XAPI will reject - #40
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ydirson
force-pushed
the
certificate-keysize-protection
branch
from
September 16, 2024 14:29
5657964 to
3e34037
Compare
bleader
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2024
benjamreis
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2024
Collaborator
Author
|
See remark at xenserver#167 (review) |
XAPI now rejects the default keysize of 7.x era, which must be regenerated before upgrading to 8.3. Let the installer refuse to initiate a situation where a Rolling Pool Upgrade would be unable to proceed, with not-yet-updated slaves holding the running VMs getting refused connection to the updated part of the pool. Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <yann.dirson@vates.tech>
ydirson
force-pushed
the
certificate-keysize-protection
branch
from
September 16, 2024 16:11
3e34037 to
6265ada
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
applied remarks from upstream PR |
bleader
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2024
benjamreis
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2024
stormi
reviewed
Sep 17, 2024
| if tool.partTableType == constants.PARTITION_DOS and utilparts is not None: | ||
| raise RuntimeError("Util partition detected on DOS partition type, upgrade forbidden.") | ||
| if self.key_size < constants.MIN_KEY_SIZE: | ||
| raise RuntimeError("Current server certificate is too small (%s bits), please regenerate with at least %s bits." % (self.key_size, constants.MIN_KEY_SIZE)) |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we add "(see the Release Notes for XCP-ng 8.3)" ? This will likely remain accurate even if people upgrade to a later release.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added, in a separate XCP-ng-specific patch.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <yann.dirson@vates.tech>
ydirson
force-pushed
the
certificate-keysize-protection
branch
from
September 23, 2024 16:52
d54d508 to
5c8d6a7
Compare
stormi
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2024
ydirson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
Upgrade: forbid upgrading with a key XAPI will reject
ydirson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2025
Upgrade: forbid upgrading with a key XAPI will reject
ydirson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
Upgrade: forbid upgrading with a key XAPI will reject
ydirson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2025
Upgrade: forbid upgrading with a key XAPI will reject
ydirson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2025
Upgrade: forbid upgrading with a key XAPI will reject
ydirson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2025
Upgrade: forbid upgrading with a key XAPI will reject
ydirson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2025
Upgrade: forbid upgrading with a key XAPI will reject
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
XAPI now rejects the default keysize of 7.x era, which must be regenerated before upgrading to 8.3. Let the installer refuse to initiate a situation where a Rolling Pool Upgrade would be unable to proceed, with not-yet-updated slaves holding the running VMs getting refused connection to the updated part of the pool.
Results in this failure, but only after the user gave authorization to write the backup:
Submitted upstream as xenserver#167